The article talks about how more and more women are attending university and that the gender balance is now thrown off. By the time the current freshman graduate the ratio will be 156 females to every 100 males. The rest of the article is about how this will bode for marriages. Not all women will be able to marry a partner with the same education as them; not all women will be able to marry a partner with the same earning potential as them. It discusses the advantages of being a less-educated women on the marriage market. And the willingness of educated women to "marry down."
Yes, this was indeed a serious article, and yes, it is still 2013. Here's a quick taste:
There may be a relative abundance of less-educated men, but the increasing willingness of educated women to marry down, and of less-educated men to marry up, in terms of education has created a shortage of men who have the means to support a family.I have so many problems with this short article that I don't even know where to begin and will probably only end up scratching the surface.
- Women don't go to university to find a husband.
- Not all women (or men) are heterosexual.
- Not everyone is interested in getting married and having children.
- Marriage is (or should be) based on love and respect, not how much someone earns.
- The term "marriage market" sets feminism back by decades.
- The entire basis of this article is insulting to both men and women by essentially saying all we can bring into a relationship is earning potential.
We need to be inspiring today's freshman to study hard, enjoy themselves responsibly, and explore and change the world. Not making them wonder whether there will be an engagement ring waiting for them after graduation.